Skill · Version 1.0.0

Legal consistency and gap review

Compares legal documents, interface disclosures and actual product behavior to identify contradictions and missing decisions.

legal-consistency-gap-review

See how it helps

When is it useful?

Use when preparing legal drafts for review or checking whether published promises match implemented workflows.

What does it help you do?

Aligns company details, definitions, service descriptions and data-handling statements.
Checks cancellation, consent, export and deletion claims against real product paths.
Produces drafts, source mapping, categorized gaps and targeted counsel questions.

Try asking this

Review our terms and privacy notice against signup and cancellation, listing missing facts, policy decisions and product fixes separately. Follow the promised cancellation and data-export paths in the product. Link each mismatch to the relevant clause and identify whether wording, policy or software must change.

Detailed documentation

Read the skill’s original instructions, examples and checks in their authored language.

Details…Show less

Legal Consistency & Gap Review

Ensure that all legal documents, UI disclosures, and actual system behaviors agree with one another, and deliver a complete, structured four-part handoff package.

Cross-Document & Product Consistency Audit

Inter-Document Alignment:
- Verify that defined terms, company details, contact addresses, governing law, dispute resolution, service descriptions, and role classifications match across the Terms of Service (GTC), Privacy Notice, Data Processing Agreement (DPA), Cookie Policy, Subprocessor List, and Order Forms / Pricing Pages.
Document-to-Product Alignment:
- Onboarding & Checkout: Check that sign-up and checkout screens present links to Terms and Privacy Notice appropriately, do not bundle mandatory contract acceptance with optional marketing consent, and capture required B2C express consent + waiver acknowledgments for immediate digital performance where applicable.
- Subscription & Cancellation: Verify that the cancellation, withdrawal, and refund steps described in the Terms match the actual account settings UI, billing webhooks, and confirmation emails.
- Privacy & Cookies: Confirm that every third-party SDK, analytics tool, AI model provider, cookie, and retention rule in the codebase is reflected in the Privacy Notice, Cookie Policy, and DPA subprocessor list.
- Data Subject & Account Actions: Check whether self-service export, correction, consent withdrawal, and account deletion promised in the text are actually implemented or have a documented manual workflow.

Mandatory Four-Part Handoff Structure

Structure every complete legal documentation delivery into four distinct parts:

Document Drafts (1. Dokumentumtervezetek):
- Clean, structured drafts of the Terms/GTC, Privacy Notice, and required companion documents (DPA, Cookie Policy, Subprocessor List, Withdrawal Form/Notice), with missing facts marked as [PLACEHOLDER: ...].
Internal Source Register (2. Belső forrásjegyzék):
- Traceability table: Requirement -> Primary Legal Source (with check date) -> Affected Product Behavior / Code Location -> Document Section.
Gap & Action List (3. Hiánylista):
- Categorized into:
  - Missing factual inputs (company data, addresses, retention periods).
  - Business & policy decisions (refund policy, B2B liability caps, notice windows).
  - Product & engineering fixes (missing UI disclosures, unblocked trackers, missing withdrawal/cancellation flow, retention cleanup jobs).
Legal Counsel Review Note (4. Felülvizsgálati jegyzet):
- Unsettled legal interpretations, jurisdiction-specific risks, remaining placeholders, and targeted questions for qualified legal counsel before publication.

Included files 1

SKILL.md