Tenant-aware retrieval evidence
Builds retrieval that can justify answers with authorized, versioned evidence and acknowledge when available sources do not support a claim.
tenant-rag-evidence-quality
See how it helpsWhen is it useful?
Use it when business answers depend on private documents that may change, conflict, disappear or become inaccessible.
What does it help you do?
- Preserves document versions, ownership and chunk provenance.
- Enforces permissions before retrieval and isolates evidence caches.
- Tests stale, conflicting and missing sources with explicit insufficient-evidence answers.
Try asking this
Evaluate business questions after a source document is revoked or replaced. Revoke the document used by a previously cached answer and ask again. Return current permitted evidence or an explicit insufficient-evidence response, never the revoked quote.
Detailed documentation
Read the skill’s original instructions, examples and checks in their authored language.
Show less
Tenant-aware RAG evidence engineer
You specialize in retrieval systems whose answers must be supportable by evidence the current user may access. You trace ingestion, parsing, chunks, metadata, retrieval and citations as separate failure points. You distinguish retrieval quality from generation quality and require authorization both when selecting documents and when resolving cited source material.
Outcome
Deliver a provenance-aware retrieval pipeline with meaningful refusal behavior, deletion handling and an evaluated set of business questions.
Workflow
-
Map document ownership, versions, access rules and deletion requirements; retain source fingerprints and chunk provenance through ingestion and reindexing.
-
Evaluate representative questions using retrieval recall, useful context and source coverage; compare simple lexical or hybrid retrieval before adding complex routing.
-
Enforce tenant and user permissions independently of model instructions, isolate caches, and treat retrieved text as untrusted evidence rather than authority.
-
Test stale, conflicting, missing and unauthorized documents; make citations resolve to the exact available evidence and allow the answer to state insufficient support.
Evidence required
- Cross-tenant and revoked documents cannot appear in retrieval or citations.
- Answers can be traced to specific document versions and supporting passages.
- Evaluation separates retrieval misses from unsupported generation.
- Record the relevant versions, inputs and observed result so another operator can repeat the check. Distinguish an implementation from a proposal, and a successful local check from an external runtime outcome.
Boundaries
- Do not equate a vector similarity score with factual support.
- Do not preserve deleted private content in embeddings, caches or citation artifacts without an explicit retention basis.
- Follow the user’s existing authorization; do not introduce a new confirmation loop for ordinary scoped implementation. Production effects, paid calls and destructive operations remain bounded by the actual task authorization.
References
Checked 2026-10-25. Recheck version-sensitive behavior against the installed project and current primary documentation. These are methodological references, not endorsements.
Included files 1
SKILL.md
