← Back to Application builder foundation team

Skill · Version 1.0.0

Turn user feedback into findings

Organizes interviews, support requests and observations into supported findings that help you decide what to improve next.

user-research-synthesis

Team members using this skill

See how it helps

When is it useful?

Use when feedback is scattered across sources or a loud feature request risks outweighing the needs of other users.

What does it help you do?

  • Separates observed behavior from stated preferences and preserves disagreement between sources.
  • Groups recurring problems by affected users, frequency and impact, with traceable evidence.
  • Links recommendations to findings and makes missing information and uncertain conclusions visible.

Try asking this

Review our onboarding interviews and support tickets. Identify recurring obstacles by user type, show supporting observations and propose the next change worth testing. Retain a dissenting interview alongside the recurring theme. Recommend a test tied to the affected user group and state what evidence would disprove the hypothesis.

Detailed documentation

Read the skill’s original instructions, examples and checks in their authored language.

Details…Show less

User Research Synthesis

Turn what people said and did into evidence a decision can rest on, without inventing anything.

Before collecting

  • Name the decision the research informs, the questions to answer and the assumptions to check.
  • In interviews, ask about past behavior, not opinions about your idea: "Walk me through the last time you …", "What did you use?", "What was hardest?", "What have you tried?", "What does it cost you in time or money?". Never pitch; compliments and "I would use that" are noise. Ask for a concrete example whenever an answer is general.

Process each source

  • Record per source: participant type and context (segment, role, experience, how often they do the task), observations, pain points, workarounds, what works, and verbatim quotes.
  • Keep behavior (what they did) apart from attitude (what they say they want). Behavior is stronger evidence; record contradictions between the two.
  • Workarounds and emotional language (frustration, resignation) mark real needs.

Quotes and honesty

  • Quote only words that appear in the source, verbatim; never compose, polish or merge quotes. Paraphrase is labeled as paraphrase.
  • Attribute quotes to a participant type ("admin, 200-person team"), never to a name or private detail.
  • A quote is evidence, not a finding; the finding is your interpretation, stated as such.
  • Never fill gaps with what users probably think. Missing information stays missing.

Find the themes

  • Tag every observation, group the tags into themes, name each theme in one sentence, and check that each has enough evidence and that themes do not overlap. Outliers stay visible.
  • Count how many participants or sources support each theme, and rate its impact. Rank by frequency and impact: frequent and severe first; rare but severe matters for a segment; frequent but minor is quality of life.
  • Triangulate: the same finding from several people, methods (interviews, survey, analytics, tickets) or times is much stronger. Disagreement between sources often reveals a segment.
  • One customer's request is not a market need. A feature request is a proposed solution: ask what problem lies behind it and how many others have that problem.

Surveys and tickets

  • Look at distributions and segments, not only averages; a mean can hide a split. Watch response bias and small samples; a tiny change in a score is noise.
  • Code open answers like interview notes and count theme frequency.

Write the synthesis

  • Overview: method, number and kind of participants or sources, time frame, the questions.
  • 5–8 findings, each with: one-sentence statement, evidence with source attribution, how many sources, impact, and confidence (high: several sources and methods; medium: suggestive; low: one or two sources, a hypothesis).
  • Segments or personas only when the data shows behavioral clusters; describe behavior and goals, not invented demographics.
  • Opportunities and recommendations, each tied to findings and concrete enough to act on ("add a progress indicator to setup", not "improve onboarding").
  • Open questions and the research that would answer them.

Before you finish

  • Every quote is verbatim from a source; nothing is invented.
  • Findings show how many sources support them and their confidence.
  • Single requests are not presented as market needs.
  • Recommendations trace to findings; gaps are stated.

Included files 2

  • LICENSE.txt
  • SKILL.md